Another mapping program, using the same GPS at the same
position, much more accurately reports the 'true' position. All Topo Maps
obviously do not work! When will you fix the GPS tool?"
Answer: Datum Shift
This is a classic Datum shift question. The All Topo Maps:
GPS tool is not broken, the user has mixed coordinates from multiple datums.
The NGS reported position is expressed in NAD83 datumed
coordinates. All Topo Maps: Texas expresses coordinates in NAD27 datums
(every Texas quadrangle is NAD27 datumed and we want our bombsight cursor to
report the same coordinates that are printed on the maps.)
The All Topo Maps: GPS tool receives the GPS
position in WGS84 datum over the serial interface link from the GPS receiver.
All Topo Maps (and the GPS) use the 'Molodensky Datum Transformation' to convert
the received WGS84 coordinate to a NAD27 coordinate and report a NAD27 position
(see
for information).
It is worth mentioning that the Molodensky Datum
Transformation is an approximation, but it does quickly generate conversions
that are close enough for consumer GPS work. A more accurate conversion is
provided by the CORPSCON program (download from http://crunch.tec.army.mil/software/corpscon/corpscon.html
).
Let's closely look at the original NGS coordinate, the
transformations and the observed GPS position for this coordinate set:
| NGS NAD83
coordinate |
N 33 17 21.0593 W 95 53 54.2151 |
| NAD27 converted
by Molodensky |
N 33 17 20.5500
W 95 53 53.27000 |
| NAD27 converted
by Corpscon |
N 33 17 20.6587
W 95 53 53.33877 |
| Observed GPS
coordinate |
N 33 17 20.7
W
95 53 53.1 |
The difference between the NAD83 coordinate and the
Corpscon converted NAD27 coordinate is 84.7 feet.
The difference between the Molodensky NAD27 coordinate and
the Corpscon NAD27 coordinate is 12.4 feet.
The GPS reading reported by All Topo Maps: Texas is within
20.93 feet of the Molodensky NAD27 value and 20.7 feet of the Corpscon NAD27
coordinate.
20 feet (6.1 meters) is about 1.6 pixels in the All Topo
Maps image database!
Here is an image showing the relationship of these points:

This screen shot of All Topo Maps was generated with this
annotation set:
<P 3>
N 33 17 21.0593 W 95 53 54.21510; WGS84 <P N> <F Red> <S Red>
N 33 17 20.65867 W 95 53 53.33877; <P W> NAD27 Corpscon <F Blue>
<S Blue>
N 33 17 20.5500 W 95 53 53.27000; NAD 27 Molodensky <P SW> <F Green>
<S Green>
N 33 17 20.7 W 95 53 53.1; GPS Reading <P E> <F Black> <S
Black>
Additional Inaccuracies
In this case we are lucky to have a very accurate
horizontal coordinate point available from the NGS database. (The point was used
as a survey base for a public airport.) Typically All Topo Map users are
snapping locations from features found on the topographic maps. How accurately
might we expect to recover these points?
The base USGS Quadrangles are produced in accordance with
the 'National Map Accuracy Standards'. From these standards (see
http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/nmpstds/acrodocs/nmas/NMAS647.PDF
) we find:
1. Horizontal accuracy. For
maps on publication scales larger than 1:20,000, not more than 10 percent of
the points tested shall be in error by more than 1/30 inch, measured on the
publication scale; for maps on publication scales of 1:20,000 or smaller, 1/50
inch. These limits of accuracy shall apply in all cases to positions of
well-defined points only. Well-defined points are those that are easily
visible or recoverable on the ground, such as the following: monuments or
markers, such as bench marks, property boundary monuments; intersections of
roads, railroads, etc.; corners of large buildings or structures (or center
points of small buildings); etc. In general what is well defined will be
determined by what is plottable on the scale of the map within 1/100 inch.
Thus while the intersection of two road or property lines meeting at right
angles would come within a sensible interpretation, identification of the
intersection of such lines meeting at an acute angle would obviously not be
practicable within 1/100 inch. Similarly, features not identifiable upon the
ground within close limits are not to be considered as test points within the
limits quoted, even though their positions may be scaled closely upon the map.
In this class would come timber lines, soil boundaries, etc.
At 1:24,000 scale, 1 inch equals 2,000 feet, so:
1/30 inch = 66.6 feet
1/50 inch = 40.0 feet
1/100 inch = 20.0 feet
Depending upon how you interpret the official statement,
we expect map coordinates to be within 40-67 feet 90% of the time! (No
indication of standard deviation is implied so 10% of the points could be ?...)
In addition to the base map inaccuracy, the DRGs (Digital
Raster Graphics) that All Topo Maps are based upon, are rubber-sheet transformed
to UTM projection. This mathematical transformation is based upon control points
manually snapped onto the map surface. Additional errors are introduced with
each step.
To the mapping errors, datum conversion errors, cursor
positioning errors, map georeferencing errors, we also must add the GPS
'Estimated Position Error' (see EPE, commonly displayed on the Satellite
Constellation display page) which is based upon the 'Dilution of Precision' (DOP
is a measure of the number of satellites and quality of satellite positions.)
Summary
Hopefully, the realities of geodetic coordinates and GPS
accuracy will not shatter your expectations of consumer GPS receivers and their
applications. The GPS's ability to accurately pinpoint your location, on the face of the
planet or in the sky, is one of the most amazing feats of technology contrived
during the 21st
century.
Happy and safe mapping!
Mark Silver, mark@igage.com